![[object Object]](/_app/immutable/assets/limited-1-464ca3c1.svg)
![[object Object]](/_app/immutable/assets/limited-2-6c4a0f68.svg)
3 veilers for the gammas is a consideration because of maxx c value. Kurikara and subversion are kinda dependent on what's popular on ladder during that moment. Other than that I probably wouldn't change anything else
Should I use this deck with the kurikara, kashtiras, and effect veilers replacing the gammas, or stay with this deck if I want to dominate opponents and be able to come back from tough situations?
For ladder, I recommend my list (no kashtiras) and maybe replacing the gammas with the veilers just for maxx c value consistency. But people on ladder will probably always play into gamma. Kurikara and subversion are cards you put in and out based on what you see. I currently have subversion in the main because I think it flows better with the current version of the deck. You should always have at least one of the two, though
We have all the relevant combo lines pinned in the SE channel in the MD discord server (on top of other things). Go check there
How often is effect veiler and kurikara used compared to gammas? And what can I replace to use kurikara?
The theory is that gamma is a much more impactful ht than veiler is, but veiler doesn't come with a brick and it's better maxx c value. As for kurikara, you usually use kurikara or subversion, they're interchangeable
For this deck, is forbidden droplet used often? And why do some pros use 2x of ash and poplar, also why not use both kurikara and subversion. And finally, for your deck, why subversion over kurikara?
and uh, why would subversion "flow better" with this deck? kurikara can save in tough spots